Research and Development - Drinking Water
Title: Detection of Enteric Viruses in Archived ICR Sample
Concentrates Using an Integrated Cell Culture-Nested PCR Technique.
Authors: Paul S. Warden, Nicola A. Ballester,
Amy E. Moore, Justin H. Fontaine, Kristen S. Fallon and Aaron B.
Margolin
Abstract:
The preamble of the Information Collection Rule (ICR) referenced
the goal of archiving virus samples for future study. From samples
submitted to our laboratory during the ICR, Analytical Services,
Inc. (ASI) and the University of New Hampshire (UNH) created a repository
of sample concentrates that were representative of a broad geographic
area and were consistent with respect to methods of sample collection,
handling and storage. The objective of this study was to examine
viral occurrence in archived source water samples using a sophisticated,
sensitive molecular technique and to compare these results to the
respective data obtained from the Total Cultivatable Virus Assay
(TCVA) method used in the ICR.
Ninety-one of these sample concentrates were subsequently analyzed
using Integrated Cell Culture/nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (ICC/nPCR)
for the detection of adenovirus 40 and 41, astrovirus, and enteroviruses
(Coxsackie virus, echovirus and poliovirus). Samples were selected
for inclusion in the study to maximize geographic distribution and
to include approximately 50% TCVA-positive and 50% TCVA-negative
samples. The analytical procedures employed for ICC/nPCR were as
previously published (Chapron, et. al, 2000). Infectivity was determined
for all ICC/nPCR positive samples. All positive results were confirmed
by re-analysis. A Performance Evaluation (PE) program was implemented
with the USEPA, primarily to assess the potential for false-positive
results.
Of the 91 samples selected for inclusion in the study, 41 were
positive by the TCVA method. In contrast, 50 of 91 samples (an increase
of 22%) were positive for one or more viral types using ICC/nPCR.
Of these 50 ICC/nPCR positive samples, 34 were confirmed to contain
one or more types of infectious viruses. Significantly, over half
of the TCVA-negative samples (29/50 or 58.0%) were positive for
one or more viral types by ICC/nPCR. Sixteen of these samples (16/50
or 32.0%) were confirmed by ICC/nPCR to contained infectious viruses.
Interestingly, of the 41 TCVA-positive samples, only 21 (51.2%)
were positive by ICC/nPCR; the other 20 were negative. This could
be caused by one or more of the following reasons: age of the sample
(samples had been stored at -80o C for 2-4 years); primer selection
(reovirus primers were not included, yet reoviruses are supported
on BGMK cells); and the presence of other non-human viruses known
to cause CPE on BGMK cells (not detected by the primers used in
our assay).
Even without reovirus included in this study, the detection of
infectious enteric viruses in over half of the samples presumed
negative by traditional cell culture methods challenges the current
assumptions regarding viral occurrence in source waters of public
water supplies in the United States and the public health risk assessments
based on these assumptions. Adenoviruses, Coxsackie virus and echovirus
are included in the USEPA Contaminant Candidate List (CCL) because
of evidence of attributable outbreaks, the need for method development
and/or the need for occurrence data. Further research is needed
using ICC/nPCR, or equally sensitive techniques, to determine the
extent of viral occurrence in source and finished waters.
Objectives
| |
• To determine the occurrence of selected human enteric
viruses in archived source water sample concentrates. |
| |
• To compare the ICR (TCVA) and ICC/nPCR data to evaluate
these methods as measures of the occurrence of the enteric viruses. |
Methods
Samples were screened for adenovirus, astrovirus, rotavirus, and
enteroviruses by ICC/nPCR using BGMK and Caco-2 cell lines and specific
primers for each viral group.
The infectious status of samples that were positive by ICC/nPCR
was determined by analyzing sample concentrates by direct PCR (or
RT-PCR) and comparing these results to ICC/nPCR.
If the ICC/nPCR reaction was positive but the PCR reaction on the
concentrate was negative, the sample was suspected to contain infectious
viruses of the given type. The laboratory procedures that were followed
have been previously published (Chapron, et. al., 2000) and are
described in the WQTC proceedings, including QA/QC, the study Performance
Evaluation program, and interference/inhibition trials.
Discussion
Viral occurrence - More samples were designated
as “positive” using ICC/nPCR than TCVA, which may be
due to increased sensitivity of ICC/nPCR and the detection of non-infectious
virus particles and/or the presence of adenovirus, astrovirus and/or
rotavirus, which do not form CPE on BGMK cells.
 |
| Figure 1. Percent of total samples (n = 91)
positive and infectious by ICC/nPCR (TCVA for reference). |
However, 49% of the TCVA positive samples were negative by ICC/nPCR.
Factors that may have contributed include:
| |
Sample Age - The samples were between two
and four years old at the time of this study. The titer of viral
stocks are known to decrease over time, and it is reasonable
to suspect that some degradation may have occurred in the sample
concentrates. |
| |
Non-target viruses – Some TCVA positives
may be due to reoviruses, which cause CPE on BGMK cells. It
is suspected that there are also non-human animal viruses that
are supported on BGMK cells and may cause CPE. |
| |
Distribution of Viral Particles – Non-uniform
distribution of viral particles in samples concentrates may
have confounded the data. |
 |
| Figure 2. Percent of TCVA positive samples
(n = 41) determined to be positive and infectious by ICC/nPCR
(TCVA for reference). |
However, enteroviruses were the most common viral type detected
by ICC/nPCR in the TCVA negative samples. All of these positive
results were confirmed to eliminate the possibility of false-positives.
Therefore, we believe these enterovirus results indicate the sensitivity
of the molecular assay compared to the traditional cell culture
assay.
 |
| Figure 3. Percent of TCVA negative samples
(n = 50) determined to be positive and infectious by ICC/nPCR. |
No study samples were positive for rotavirus by ICC/nPCR, although
routine samples and controls were normal. This may indicate the
need for optimizing the method for archived samples, rather than
rotavirus absence, and may have caused the overall virus occurrence
rate to have been underestimated.
Viral Infectivity
Infectious viruses were detected in fewer samples by ICC/nPCR than
TCVA (34 vs. 41 of 91, respectively). The three factors discussed
above may have contributed to these results.
Viruses were detected by ICC/nPCR in 58% of the 50 TCVA negative
samples (32% infectious). If this statistic is validated in a more
comprehensive survey, it would be a very significant finding that
over half of the sources waters are contaminated with viruses and
approximately one-third contain infectious viruses.
Enteroviruses were the most commonly detected infectious virus by
ICC/nPCR (25 samples), followed by adenovirus (17) and astrovirus
(6). However, when examined as a ratio of infectious to positive
(by ICC/nPCR); adenovirus has the highest frequency (17 infectious
of 24 positive or 70.8%), then enterovirus (25 of 38 or 65.8%) and
then astrovirus (6 of 18, or 33.3%). These data may suggest differential
viral infectivity rates in the environment and lend increased importance
to the study of adenoviruses.
The rates of viral occurrence, and the rate of occurrence of infectious
viruses indicated in this study are substantial and are higher than
the rates reported from the ICR. Even without reovirus included
in this study, the detection of infectious enteric viruses in over
half of the samples presumed negative by traditional cell culture
methods challenges the current assumptions regarding viral occurrence
in sources waters of the public water supplies in the United States
and the public health risk assessments based on these assumptions.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the
U.S. EPA. (Order No. 0C-W025-NASA). The authors are grateful to
Mary Ann Feige and Dr. Shay Fout, who provided project guidance.
References
USEPA. 1998. Announcement of the Drinking Water Contaminant
Candidate List. Federal Register. 63:10274-10287.
USEPA. 1999. Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
Regulation for Public Water Systems; Final Rule. Federal Register.
64: 50555-50620.
Chapron, C.D., N.A. Ballester, J.H. Fontaine, C.N. Frades and A.B.
Margolin. 2000. The Detection of Astrovirus, Enteroviruses and Adenovirus
Type 40 and 41 in Surface Waters Collected and Evaluated by the
Information Collection Rule and Integrated Cell Culture/Nested PCR
Procedure. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 66, no.
6, .2520-2525.
Gerba, C. 2001, personal communication (to A. Margolin).
Pina, S. M. Puig, F. Lucena, J. Jofre and R. Girones. 1998.
Viral Pollution in the Environment and in Shellfish: Human Adenovirus
Detection by PCR as an Indicator of Human Viruses. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, Vol. 64, No. 9, p. 3376-3382. |